Understanding Early Man : Scientific Discovery vs. Emotionally Driven Hypothesis :: Anthropology Essays Paleontology Papers

Understanding untimely Man Scientific Discovery vs. Emotionally Driven HypothesisThe ship canal in which we attempt to determine the taradiddle of early man presuppose ofttimes more nigh who we ar today, and who we will be tomorrow, and who we command to be today, and who we want to be tomorrow, than they do about who we were in the past. This argument comes from a person who knows little about erudition, and less about the particular scientific techniques drilld in archeological excavation and analysis. But it seems to me that much of the observations that ar made in the study of early man are predicated as much on naked theory as they are on old observation, and much of the old observation seems to be found on how humans act now, rather than in the past.For instance, an entire new field of study known as Evolutionary Psychology is establish on the premise that we can comprehend who we are today establish on how we have evolved, and what we have evolved from. Evoluti on, is more or less a proven fact, analogous to gravity, it is a theory that we have substance abused to understand countless other phenomena in the world around us. But there is no theory about how early man behaved, how he evolved, or even, what he looked like, that comes even close to being as widely accepted. In other words, this new field of study is based on science that does not yet exist, and might not ever exist, and the thinking crumb it is similar to thinking behind the study of early man. Evolutionary psychologists use things we dont know about who we were then to try and understand who we are now, and anthropologists use things we dont know about who we are now to try and understand who we were then.Our debates about these early human ancestors echo our debates about our present and our modern history to such a degree, that in some ways, this echo seems to cast doubts on the entire process of examination.A coarse debate in history departments around the world who s tudy the Twentieth Century concerns what is known as the vast Man Theory. This theory supposes that the major events, and major social changes, of the past blow were due more to the actions of a handful of men and women (usually those in positions of great power, or those who made important scientific discoveries) rather than to the actions of the majority.