Tuesday, February 5, 2019
One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest :: essays research papers fc
QUESTIONWas Forman compelled to change the bakshis of view in his adaptation of wiz Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest?ANSWERForman was compelled to change the point of view in adapting the daybook into a film.REASONINGA.In the book Chief Bromdens thoughts go from stark naive realism and understanding to dreams and visions which would be difficult for an audience to follow.B.The confusion created by the Chiefs switches from reality to fantasy is possible in literary form due to the descend of detail and analysis, which can be put down on paper. However, this is impractical for a director to catch up with the akin understanding and depth in a two-hour film. C.Chief Bromdens thoughts and fallacys, which argon the narration in the book, are erratic and crazy when not compared and elaborated. In a film, it is not incessantly possible to clarify on the type of flesh tabu found in the book.D.There is not enough time nor is it possible to elucidate into the numerate of detail which Ke n Kesey goes into in the book. This is due to the fact that Chief Bromden starts divulge playing deaf and dumb and even when he does begin to rag it is not in great amounts or details. In order to capture the heart of the story a director would have to use a broader narration, which a diverse audience could understand.E.A book allows for great amounts of details due to the depth of words and the imagery they can evoke in a readers mind. There is not enough time in a film for all the detail of a book to come out and explain every single character to an audience, which needs to be ever entertained to keep their focus.CITATIONSThis is an autobiographical reference to how Ken Kesey came to write One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest and the processes, which made it realistic and fantastical at the same time.But also at the same time Bromden is an unreliable protest he is also an extremely reliable one. We feel he tells us the truth about McMurphy in fact, he tells it with such penetration and perspicacity that it has a consistent and coherent shape and meaning for us. The combination of hallucination and truth in the narration is a notable stylistic accomplishment. detail and fantasy alternate, but the reader has no difficulty distinguishing one from the other, and hence they successfully complement each other.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment