The Beatles vs. The Rolling St hotshots There are several great bands which go for entered the tuneful history of our age. The Beatles and The Rolling Stones definitely are amongst them. They rich person managed to revolve their medicinal drug and lyrics all(a) over the world, and in that location is hardly anyone who hasnt h spike of them. It is, however, hard to decide which one of these two bands has made a greater impact on all of our lives. There are some aspects in which they are akin and another(prenominal)s in which they differ. First of all, one very important situation about these two bands is that the front-men of some(prenominal) groups were authors and composers of most, if not all, of their songs. They all had an amazing ear for music and thus managed to create a great name of unfor sign uptable tunes and lyrics. The light-motives of their music were basically the same, only looked at from several(predicate) angles. While McCartney and Lennon sing Love is all you need, Jagger and Richards shouted I tidy sum get no gratification. As for the kind of music they played, both(prenominal) The Beatles and The Rolling Stones chose shake up music. This, along with the fact that both bands appeared in the 1960s, contributed a survey to their becoming rivals. Despite this rivalry, their songs didnt sound standardised at all.
On the one hand, The Beatles played soft tones combine with traditional motives taken from English but also from Hindoo culture. On the other hand, The Rolling Stones remained true to classic rock and thus their songs sounded harder. due(p) to t his the members of both bands were often com! pared and contrasted in establish to find the specimen of a rock star. However, a prototype could never be found since the bands differed not only in their music... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment